This is TikiWiki CMS/Groupware v1.9.11 -Sirius- © 2002–2008 by the Tiki community Mon 25 of Sep, 2017 [15:03 UTC]
Menu
Last actions

Disunion 01

Disunited Behind Closed Doors
Trade Unions
print
Disunited Behind Closed Doors

With the appreciated support of its partners in “Vote the Change”, SID won a mandate on the Luxembourg Staff Committee (LSC) in 2010. We have published very little about the workings of the LSC for three good reasons. First: the binding legal bases of the LSC completely exclude any co-decision rights with management. In practice managers also flout its consultation and information rights with impunity. Second: 17 of the 20 mandates have fallen to the Disunion Syndicale(DS), so most discussions are internal affairs of the majority. Third: the official minutes and other documents of the LSC are professionally drafted, though terribly boring.

Two recent events are worth bringing to the public’s attention because they reveal otherwise hidden truths about the DS, which often proclaims its unity and its professionalism in PR campaigns.

First, the DS decided to change the internal rules of the LSC. By the rules they needed 14 of their 17 mandates to do so. The present writer knew that something was amiss when one of the DS’ most senior officials approached him with the request for his, the 18th, vote in favour of the proposed changes. “What, has the DS decided to seek a consensus rather than a power play, as it has traditionally done?” he wondered.
Briefly summarized, the DS proposed to lower the quorums of votes needed for routine decisions and for fundamental ones. If the quorum was missed during one meeting a lower one would apply during the next. In the most extreme case, 7 votes might have been a majority of 20. The argument against this seems obvious. But, to be fair, it can also be argued that 13 representatives who fail to show up should not be allowed to paralyze those who came to the meeting. Why would a Disunion with 17 mandates of its own allow 7 representatives to form a majority? There must be an explanation. There was also the surprising idea to allow substitute members of the Staff Committee to be elected to its presidency. Why do such a thing when the Disunion has 17 representatives on the Local Staff Committee? One of those 17 substitutes must really be excellent. (The Commission's Legal Service ruled this out later. Does that ruling have something to do with the way the LSC President retired from the Commission in June and was rehired in July? Or did he just change his mind?)

Because the proposed changes were neither brilliant nor awful, the present writer attempted to insert an amendment of his own. (The limited time employment contract of his substitute had run out and he asked for the right to replace her with the next substitute on the electoral list.) The DS refused the amendment and your scribe refused to give his vote to the un-amended change. Surprise! The proposal received only 12 (not 17) votes and thus failed to carry because 14 are required to change the rules. By arithmetic, 5 of the DS representatives had refused to vote along with the majority of their Disunion.

Gleeful sarcasm aside, there is something to be said for people who vote for what they, and not their leaders, think is best. The internal LSC discussion showed some different points of view, but the underlying cause of the differences within the majority remained obscure, at least to this observer. The 1 member Vote the Change group of the LSC is practicing more transparency than the 17 DS people taken together.

At the next meeting of the LSC the DS managed to scrape up the necessary majority for its rule changes. If you know what was going on behind the scenes, send us an email.

There were more fun and games at the most recent meeting of the LSC, much more. The DS leadership announced that it had decided to strip one of its representatives of all the five mandates that they had delegated to him and give those posts to five other people. A lengthy and acrimonious debate ensued that revealed much, but not what the poor fellow had done to deserve such mistreatment.

It was pandemonium. One DS rep announced that she would vote with her leadership, but that she disagreed with their decision. Two others said that they would vote against their bosses despite “certain consequences”. Then one more stood up and declared that she could not remain in the chamber under the given circumstances.

Disregarding democratic principles and practices, the DS pushed through the decision to vote the one dismissal and the five new appointments in one solid block (like the Soviet block). No one has the right to subject staff representatives to this kind of extortion.

It seems that other staff reps were also unhappy with the proceedings. When the votes were counted the proposal had received 10, not 17. It was defeated because it would have needed a majority of 11.
It is alright for a majority to assert itself in voting. But when that majority falls apart during key votes, its credibility becomes questionable. The most serious problem is that no one is telling staff (voters) what is going on inside the DS, which is the staff representation until 2013. The worst possible revelations would be better than this secrecy. It is probable that there is nothing really sinister going on behind the closed doors. Democracy would work better if they opened them so that the many people they represent could make informed choices about whatever the issues are. How can voters vote if they don't know what is going on?

If the members of the Disunion use the same energy and ingenuity against the threatening Deform that they deploy against one another, then the future of Commission staff looks bright.




Created by: admin last modification: Thursday 26 of July, 2012 [14:07:53 UTC] by admin

wiki page: May 2013 01 · May Day 2012 · May Day 2012 ITUC · Challenge 01 · March8 2013 01 · 27 Nasty Foreigners 01 · Staff Budget 01 · Public Sector Enemy Number One? · Dyslexia at work in a multilingual environment · CA 17022012 lux 01 · CA Open Letter 01 · Eating Your Own Words · As Much Democracy as Possible in the Luxembourg Staff Committee Elections · Intra Muros 01 · No Nukes 01 · Nobel EU 01 · Incredible Statistics 01 · Disunited 02 · Dalli 01 · Heads Tails 01 · Art 27 04 · Staff General Assembly in support to the Contract Agents in Luxembourg · Staff Regulations Review 01 · Art 27 01 · Staff Development 01 · Deform 01 · Reform Evil_01 · Should EU Institutions discriminate against university educated citizens at a time of Generation 1000 euros and many university graduates out of a job · Two Xeform Two · Disunion 01 · G2004 01 · Some SID photos · Dgt Save Preamble 01 · front page history 06 · front page history 3 · front page history 5 · front page history01 · front page history02 · front page history4 · Chuck Norris Facts and Our Social Dialogue · Three Good Reasons 01 · SID Commission Brussels' candidates for Local Staff Committee elections 2012 · Ad Hoc 2011 01 · DGT – Restructuring, Can the disaster be averted? · DGT 01 · Comments and Views from Swedish EU officials on the forthcoming Review of the Staff Regulations for Officials of the EU Institutions · Kommentarer / synpunkter från svenska EU-anställda med anledning av den kommande revideringen av anställningsvillkoren inom EU · Swede Rep SE · Swede Rep EN · 7 orsaker + 1 slutsats => 2.000 jobb att rädda · Är personalavdelningens sociala monolog ens avlägset demokratisk? · Fighting Poll Tax 01 · seven reasons 01 · X Clock Card 01 · 2% Feminism kontra 98% Kvinnohatare · insure05 · Legal Insurance I · IBS 01 · Express versus SID · IP laws stop SMEs create jobs and prosperity for us all · Cutting Eurostat 01 · Fed EU EN 01 · Fed EU FR 01 · Wikiwitch01 · WikiWitch Aint Dead · Feminism Mysogynism 01 · Three Million 01 · 15 10 2011 · CA Coffee EN · CA Coffee FR · Slim Cat 01 · Bild kontra SID · bild01 · How to negotiate for the next Method · Pérez Reverte 01 · serge reynaud facteur menacer par les poursuites disciplinaires · serge reynaud the postman who is going though diciplinary procedure · Big_Middle_Little · 52.3 % of the votes = 85 % of the seats. Is this in the interest of Staff? · SID platform · SID on president José Manuel Durão Barroso's State of the Union Address 2011 speech in Strasbourg · X ChamberPot 01 · Goin Viral 01 · Steps CA 01 · Big Bad HR 01 · SID's petition 192/2009 is finally through to the Legislative Committee · Public Sector Strike in the UK on 30 June 2011 and EU Officials Strike in Brussels on 29 June 2011 · Public Transport Petition · May 2011 · Profs de Langue 01 · We've Come A Long Way · X02 ShipWrecked 02 · ShipoWrecked 01 · Limited Careers · Contempt of Court Contempt of Luxembourg · do you want to take the red or the blue pill · SID questions Commission proposal to reform once again the EU Staff Regulations · X01 01 · Defend Pensions FR · Defend Pensions EN · Arbitrary Procedures 01 · Unanswered questions to Mr Kallas · Une déclaration de guerre du Conseil contre le Service public européen · Charte Européenne des Droits fondamentaux : Dernière forteresse de l'espérance ? · Staff General Assembly in support to the Contract Agents · Regarding collective action of SJE and SID against our salary cuts · Clinging to EU charter of Fundamental Rights as the best bastion of hope · How many IT jobs are to be lost as a result of Cloud Computing madness · Budget Line 26 01 02 11 · SID became an affiliate member of Amnesty International UK · SID candidates for Brussel Staff Committee election and their program · SID candidates in VOTE THE CHANGE list in Luxembourg Local Staff Elections 2010 · Message of solidarity from SID to all Irish Public Service trade Unions · A Thought for Mayday 2010 · Mayday 2010, No to Bailing Out Billionaires, Yes to Real Economic Development · Local Staff Committee Rules · Local Staff Election system and results · National Union of Teachers · Highlights of SID platform · Detached from Democracy · Beyond Local Staff Elections · The D stands for Democracy · All you ever wanted to know about SID · The Roots of SID · March 8th; Help Amnesty International Stop War Crimes Against Women and their Children · March 8, Women and Hot Air · Protect the EU from its Friends · Does Admin believe in Miracles? · Corporations versus Citizens; Profit before People · Crucifixion and the CDR · Commission's Admin does its best to cope with the financial crisis · Sammanfattning av nyheter angående Kamangar gjord av studenter på universitetet i Amirkabir · Degradando al personal de la Comision · No to Economic Cannibalism Yes to Social Democracy and Co-decision · On Democracy and local Staff election results in Luxembourg 2007 · Mayday- Mayday Pensions going down · le douteux processus de certification de monsieur kallas · How the method sometimes malfunctions · dubious kallas certification process · articles 64 and 65 · ELECTION DES REPRESENTANTS DU PERSONNEL SALARIE OGBL · 2000 job cuts and what we did about it · In defense of Iranian trade unionists · Faible politique anti harcelement · election results 2007 Luxembourg in Spanish · A Weak Anti Harassment Policy · Local Workers Teachers and Phantoms · Kallas CDR reform · Do you remember that 2000 Jobs were to go in 2006 · CDR COMPASS SCOP and the unfortunate Officials · Will it solve your promotion problems · Kallas CDR Ultimatum in Spanish · Le monologue de l Administration Sociale pourrait il etre ne serait ce qu au moins vaguement democratique · Die CDR- das Ultimatum und das Referendum · CDR in Hungarian · Democracia Ltd Abuso de la RFID ·

Current events
Powered by Tikiwiki Powered by PHP Powered by Smarty Powered by ADOdb Made with CSS Powered by RDF
RSS Wiki RSS Maps rss Calendars
Powered by Tikiwiki CMS/Groupware | Installed by SimpleScripts